Last week, I wrote about choosing happiness. At the end of the essay, I mentioned the sentiment of some that choosing happiness keeps you from achieving long-term success. I want to expand on that thought this week.
The argument goes something like this: it takes drive and motivation to make change in your life, so if you are happy with things the way they are, you don’t have the motivation necessary to change things. To achieve more, you have to be dissatisfied with some things… therefore being happy is incompatible with being successful.
On the surface, there is one glaring issue with this argument: you only have to be dissatisfied with one little thing in your life to make a change in that thing… you can be happy about everything else.
There’s also a deeper problem with the argument: there is a difference between being happy and being comfortable. The argument is really about being comfortable.
What’s the difference?
I am happy that I have food on the table. I am happy that I receive the nourishment I need to survive. I am uncomfortable with how much time I have to spend preparing food, even though I’m happy to prepare food. In my ideal world, I wouldn’t have to cook unless I felt like it, but whenever I do cook, I enjoy the process, even when I would rather be doing something else.I am happy to cook every day if I need to, and I would rather not need to. See the difference?
How about another example: I am happy to spend the money to go out to the movies sometimes. I think movie tickets cost too much compared to my income (especially when I factor in popcorn and drinks). I am uncomfortable with how much a movie costs, but when I make the decision to spend money on an evening at the theater, I am happy do so. I don’t let the cost bother me when I make the choice to do it even though I wish movies cost less (or I made more - same difference).
I strive to be happy in everything I do. Most of the time, it’s easy: I have fun naturally in most things I do. I find things to be happy about if they aren’t obvious. Happiness is a choice.
And, at the same time, I look for ways to improve my life that would have value to me. I seek ways to spend less (time or money) on the things I have to do so that I have more for the things I want to do.
I choose to be happy, and I always seek enhancements. But when I can’t find the enhancements, I am still happy.
‘Ah,’ you say, ’so it’s a trick of words: you really mean you are as happy as you can be but you want to be happier.’
No. I am completely happy, and I’ll be completely happy if I make a change for the better. Not happier, just happy in a different way.
If I were to lose everything, I would still be happy. I would work hard to get much or all of it back, because I like the things I have. But I don’t need anything to be happy. I don’t want anything to be happy. I am just happy.
That’s the difference.
In the news
- I think the people most likely to be at risk would also be the hardest to find for testing: Universal test ‘would slash Aids’
- Be careful who you work for: Bad bosses may damage your heart
- The thought police strike again… really, would you be offended? Stop using ‘dearie’, nurses told
Quote for the week
Happiness arises in a state of peace, not of tumult. - Ann Radcliffe
Healthy thoughts,
Jeff


